Search the Issue Highlights:  

Search Tips

Issue Index About SPR Subscriptions The Author  
 

 

 
     

June, 2008
 

Overview of topics...

LEAD NOTE :

  • AMENDMENT OF RULES ON ELECTRONIC FILING
    Electronic Filing Added as Option in Civil and Some Surrogates' Courts in "Pilot Program"; Supreme Court Rule on Electronic Filing Is Amended and Re-Formed

SPECIAL NOTE:

  • Doctrine of Estoppel Against Inconsistent Positions: H's Failure to List Loan to Borrower as Asset in Florida Marital Action Bars H from Suing Borrower Now

GENERAL PRACTICE:

  • Plaintiff Proving Delivery of Summons to Clerk on Time Rebuts Presumption of Lateness Deriving from Clerk's Date Stamp
  • Time for M's Claim for Distress Based on F's Disinterment of Their Children Doesn't Start Until M Learns of the Wrong
  • Example of Costs Award Against D for Removing Unremovable Case
  • Court Enforces Australian Judgment for Counsel Fees of $89,000 Awarded After Opposing Party Turned Down $7000 Offer

BACKLOG ITEMS:

  • Service on Insurer in Behalf of Insured Defendant in Tort Case Okay Only If Clear That Insurer's Policy Applies
  • Because Share of 90%-At Fault P Can't Be Factored In, D with Only 10% Share Has to Fully Reimburse Settlement Made by Contractor Who Has Absolute Liability under Labor Law 240(1)
  • While Lower Court Has Unlimited Jurisdiction of Rent Claim in Summary Proceeding, Acceleration Clause Sums Aren't "Rent"
  • Nonlawyer Member of LLC Can't Take Appeal in LLC's Behalf

 


 ARTICLE HEADLINES


Feature Article:

AMENDMENT OF RULES ON ELECTRONIC FILING
Electronic Filing Added as Option in Civil and Some Surrogates' Courts in "Pilot Program"; Supreme Court Rule on Electronic Filing Is Amended and Re-Formed

General Practice:

CONTESTING CLERK'S DATE STAMP
Plaintiff Proving Delivery of Summons to Clerk on Time Rebuts Presumption of Lateness Deriving from Clerk's Stamp

"EMOTIONAL DISTRESS" ACCRUAL
Time for M's Claim for Distress Based on F's Disinterment of Their Children Doesn't Start Until M Learns of the Wrong

 

 


REMOVAL TO FEDERAL COURT
Example of Costs Award Against D for Removing Unremovable Case

ATTORNEYS' FEES
Court Enforces Australian Judgment for Counsel Fees of $89,000 Awarded After Opposing Party Turned Down $7000 Offer

arrow bullet Special Note:

DOCTRINE OF ESTOPPEL AGAINST INCONSISTENT POSITIONS
Failure to List Loan as Asset in Florida Marital Action Bars H from Suing Borrower on Big Loan

Backlog Items bulleted arrow Backlog Items:

COURT-ORDERED SERVICE
Service on Insurer in Behalf of Insured Defendant in Tort Case Okay Only If Clear That Insurer's Policy Applies

 

 

JOINT AND SEVERAL LIABILITY
Because Share of 90%-At Fault P Can't Be Factored In, D with Only 10% Share Has to Fully Reimburse Settlement Made by Contractor Who Has Absolute Liability under Labor Law 240(1)

"ACCELERATED RENT" JURISDICTION
While Lower Court Has Unlimited Jurisdiction of Rent Claim in Summary Proceeding, Acceleration Clause Sums Aren't "Rent"

LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES
Nonlawyer Member of LLC Can't Take Appeal in LLC's Behalf

 

         
  ©1993 David D. Siegel  All rights reserved.   |   Web design & hosting by Azurelink.   |  Site Comments?