|  
               
              FEATURE ARTICLE: 
            ALLOWING SERVICE BY E-MAIL ON DIVORCE DEFENDANT 
            HIDING IN SAUDI ARABIA, COURT OFFERS EXTENSIVE REVIEW OF CPLR 308(5) 
            (COURT-ORDERED SERVICE) 
             
              
              GENERAL PRACTICE 
            EXTENDING TIME FOR SERVICE: 
              Difficulties of Serving Defendant in Foreign 
              Country Justify Extension of Time  
               
              COLLATERAL SOURCE PAYMENTS: 
              New Law: Defendant Is Not Entitled to a Credit 
              for "Voluntary Charitable Contributions" Received by Injured 
              Person 
               
              TRACKING NO-FAULT "REG 68": 
              Appellate Status of Rule Reducing Time to 
              Notify Carrier of No-Fault Claim 
               
             
             | 
            | 
           
           
               
              COMMERCIAL RULE 12:  
              Attempt to Use CPLR 3103 to Secure Stay of 
              Disclosure Is Rejected as Subterfuge to Evade Commercial Rule 12 
               
               
              INTERPLEADER OF INSURANCE PROCEEDS: 
               Court Cites "Equitable" Nature 
              of Interpleader Device in Apportioning Between Lessor and Lessee 
            Proceeds of Policy on Leased Chattel 
            EFFECT OF COMPENSATION AWARD: 
              While Administrative Award Usually Gets Collateral 
              Estoppel Effect, It Doesn't If Party Had No "Stake" In 
            the Actual Determination 
            INTEREST ON VERDICT: 
              After Court Increases Verdict, Which Defendant 
              Appeals from, Defendant Can't Just Deposit Into Court Lower Sum 
              Jury Awarded (So as to Avoid Interest)  
             
             | 
           
            | 
           
              
              ARTICLE 16 RIGHTS: 
               In Determining Ratios of Fault under Article 
              16, Does Share of Bankrupt Tortfeasor Still Get Factored In? 
               
              LAWYER'S LIABILITY FOR PROCESS SERVER: 
              Court Says Lawyer Is Liable Only to Own Client 
            (Plaintiff) for Negligent Process Server, Not to Defendant 
            SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS: 
              Shortening of Time to Move to Less Than 120 
              Days May Be Made by General Court Rule Instead of Individual Judge's 
              Order 
             
             |