FEATURE ARTICLE: 
            AMENDMENT OF CPLR 4518(a) ALLOWS COMPUTER BUSINESS 
            RECORDS TO BE INTRODUCED INTO EVIDENCE IN PAPER OR OTHER TANGIBLE 
            FORM 
             
              
            GENERAL PRACTICE 
             
            DIRECTED VERDICT VERSUS JUDGMENT N.O.V.: 
            Appellate Division Reminder That Judgment N.O.V 
            Is Better Than Directed Verdict, So As to Generate Jury Verdict for 
            Appellate Reinstatement  
             
            ESTOPPEL TO PLEAD STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS: 
            Divided Appellate Division Estops D from Pleading 
            Statute of Limitations Because D Delayed Furnishing Records to P 
             
             
             
           | 
            | 
           
           
              
              LEGAL MALPRACTICE:
			   
              In Law Firm's 
              Fee Action Against Client, Client's Inclusion of Malpractice Counterclaim 
              Only in Amended, Not Original, Answer, Denies Client Use of "Relation 
              Back" Doctrine
			   
			   
              TIME TO APPEAL: 
               Case Can't Be Kept Alive by Delaying Entry 
              of "Judgment" When Earlier "Order" of Dismissal 
            Was Itself Final 
            SURVEILLANCE TAPES IN REVERSE?: 
              P Required to Surrender Wedding Tapes to 
              D 
               
              JURISDICTION FOR RENT JUDGMENT: 
              Service in Summary Proceeding That Would 
              Confer Personal Jurisdiction in Action Does Not Necessarily Afford 
              Basis for Rent Judgment 
               
             
             | 
           
            | 
           
              
              PROOF AT INQUEST: 
              P Can't Use Mere Affidavits at Inquest in 
              Tort Case; Despite Default on Liability, D Is Entitled to Cross-Examine 
            on Damages 
             
              
            BACKLOG ITEMS 
            EXPERT DISCLOSURE: 
               Court Allows Undisclosed Expert to Testify 
              When Disclosed Expert Doesn't Show 
               
              FOREIGN ARBITRAL AWARDS: 
              Foreign Country Arbitration Award for $23 
              Million Gets Enforced in New York Only to the Extent of Five Cents 
               
               
             
             |