FEATURE ARTICLE: 
            CONFUSING ROLE PLAYED BY CPLR 3126 -- THE DISMISSAL 
            FOR FAILURE TO MAKE DISCLOSURE -- IN THE LAXNESS DISMISSAL REALMS 
            OF CPLR 3216 AND 3404  
             
              
            GENERAL PRACTICE 
             
            "IN LIMINE" MOTIONS: 
            Court Says There's No Requirement That "In 
            Limine" Motions Be in Writing   
             
            EXPERT DISCLOSURE: 
            P's Failure to Identify Experts Bars P from 
            Using Them Even Just to Oppose D's Motion for Summary Judgment  
             
            TIME LIMIT ON ENTERING ORDERS: 
            60-Day Time Limit for Entering Order or Judgment 
            Still Turning Victories into Defeats 
             
             
           | 
            | 
           
           
              
              EXTENDING TIME FOR SUIT: 
               Extension of Time Must Be Sought in First 
            Action, Not in Second One After Expiration of Statute of Limitations 
            SERVICE IN SPECIAL PROCEEDING: 
              Service in Special Proceeding Made Before 
              Filing Is Void and Gets No Time Extension; Recent Amendment Does 
              Not Change That 
             
             
              
            BACKLOG ITEMS 
            TOLL FOR INSANITY: 
              Whether P Gets Toll for Insanity Is Fact 
              Question for Court, Not Jury  
               
              MECHANIC'S LIEN:  
              Whole Mechanic's Lien Expires Because P Didn't 
              Get Lis Pendens Extended; Foreclosure Action Dismissed  
               
              
             | 
           
            | 
           
              
              JURISDICTION FOR RENT JUDGMENT: 
              Service in Summary Proceeding That Would 
              Confer Personal Jurisdiction in Action Affords Basis for Rent Judgment 
               
             
             
              
            FEDERAL PRACTICE 
            CHOICE OF LAW IN TRANSFERRED CASE: 
               If Federal Court in Original District Would 
              Have Dismissed Claim, Transferor Law Does Not Accompany Case to 
              New York 
               
              REMOVAL TO FEDERAL COURT: 
              30-Day Period for Removing State Action Runs 
              from Time of Service on Last-Served, Not First-Served, Defendant               
               
               
              
             |