FEATURE ARTICLE: 
            FOLLOWING FEDERAL EXAMPLE OF 28 U.S.C.A. § 
            1407, NEW YORK "LITIGATION COORDINATING PANEL" IS ESTABLISHED 
            TO "QUASI" CONSOLIDATE PRETRIAL PROCEEDINGS IN RELATED ACTIONS 
            PENDING IN DIFFERENT COUNTIES; "INTERIM PROCEDURES" ALREADY 
            PROMULGATED 
             
              
            GENERAL PRACTICE 
             
            STATEMENT OF CLIENT'S RIGHTS:  
            Reminder About Posting Statement in Lawyer's 
            Office 
             
           | 
            | 
           
           
              
                SERVING 
              CORPORATIONS: 
              No Default Vacatur When Failure of Notice 
              Was Corporation's Fault for Not Updating Address in Secretary of 
            State's Office 
            TAKING DEFAULT JUDGMENT: 
               Failure to File Proof of the "Additional" 
              Service Required Before Taking Default Judgment Is Not Jurisdictional 
            Defect 
            ATTORNEY'S WORK PRODUCT: 
              Review of "Work Product" Immunity 
              in Legal Malpractice Action Under Federal Rule Sheds Light on Equivalent 
              Issues under CPLR 
               
              REMOVAL TO FEDERAL COURT: 
              Motivation to Avoid Federal Jurisdiction 
              by Adding Party and/or Dropping Claim Doesn't Bar Remand 
               
              
             | 
           
            | 
           
             
            CONSUMER CREDIT TRANSACTIONS: 
            Strict Venue Limits in Consumer Cases, Often 
            Overlooked, Get Applied Against a P.C. That Regularly Disregarded 
            Them 
             
            PRESERVING JURISDICTIONAL OBJECTION: 
             When Can Amended Answer Include Jurisdictional 
            Objection That Original Answer Omitted? 
             
            THE CONTINUING "GRAVE INJURY" DILEMMA— 
            Even If Summary Judgment Is Seemingly Warranted 
            on "Grave Injury" Issue, Shouldn't Impleader of Employer 
            Be Allowed to Stand Until Trial? 
             
             
            |