Search the Issue Highlights:  

Search Tips

Issue Index About SPR Subscriptions The Author  
 

 

 
     

JANUARY 1999
 
Overview of topics...

Lead Note:

ANOTHER DIMENSION TO THE HENRY CASE: WHAT TOLL FOR INFANCY IF THE PARENTS ARE NOT PROPERLY REPRESENTING THE INFANT'S INTERESTS?

Tracking the New Laws:

 

  • Failure to File Proof of Service in Lower Courts Not Jurisdictional, as It Was in Supreme Court
  • Meritoriousness of Late Summmary Judgment Motion Can't Excuse Lateness in Moving

General Practice:

 

  • Conflict on Whether D Can Depose P Before Handing Over Surveillance Tapes
  • Late "Renewal" of Motion Granted Because Facts Not Learned of Until Electronic Data System Installed
  • What Service in Summary Proceeding Suffices to Secure Rent Judgment as Well as Repossession?

Backlog Items:

 

  • Marital Home Remains Okay for Service Even If Debtor Sometimes Temporarily Resides Elsewhere
  • Failure to Move for Directed Verdict Concedes Case Is for Jury
  • Additional Issues as Barring Use of CPLR 3213 Motion for Action on Note
  • App Div Refuses Penalty for Violating 60-Day "Entry" Rule; Nunc Pro Tunc Entry Directed

Open Citations:

 

  • Dimovich (Issue 78:1): 248 A.D.2d 951.
  • Abrahami (78:3): 248 A.D.2d 272.
  • Kelly (76:2): 178 Misc.2d 176, 678 N.Y.S.2d 708.
  • Chin (76:2): 248 A.D.2d 235.
  • B.U.D. (76:3): 248 A.D.2d 856.
  • Valdez (72:3): 248 A.D.2d 707.

 ARTICLE HEADLINES

FEATURE ARTICLE:
ANOTHER DIMENSION TO THE HENRY CASE: WHAT TOLL FOR INFANCY IF THE PARENTS ARE NOT PROPERLY REPRESENTING THE INFANT'S INTERESTS?

 TRACKING THE NEW LAWS

"FAILURE TO FILE":
Failure to File Proof of Service in Lower Courts Is Not Jurisdictional, as It Was in Supreme Court Until Recently

TIME LIMIT ON SUMMARY JUDGMENT:
Court Holds That Mere Demonstration That Summary Judgment Motion Has Merit Does Not Excuse Delay and Allow Late Motion

 
 GENERAL PRACTICE

SURVEILLANCE TAPES:
Conflict Develops on Whether P Must Depose Before Being Entitled to D's Surveillance Tapes

ELECTRONIC DATA AS RENEWAL BASIS:
Court Excuses Delay in Furnishing New Evidence on Old Motion on Ground It Was Only Learned of Through New Electronic Data Subscription

SUMMARY PROCEEDINGS:
Justice Court Discusses Barriers to Rent Judgments When Service in the Proceeding Is Made by Other Than Personal Delivery


 
 BACKLOG ITEMS

USUAL PLACE OF ABODE:
If Trial Separation Is for Unspecified Time, Marital Residence Remains "Usual Place of Abode" for Service Purposes

PRO FORMA MOTION STILL NEEDED:
Failure to Move for Directed Verdict on Liability Concedes There's Issue of Fact

CPLR 3213 MOTION/ACTION:
Need for "De Minimis" Additional Showing Doesn't Bar Use of CPLR 3213 Motion/Action on Money Instrument

60-DAY ENTRY RULE:
Winning D's Failure to Settle Judgment Cured with Nunc Pro Tunc Order; "Abandonment" Not Imposed

         
  ©1993 David D. Siegel  All rights reserved.   |   Web design & hosting by Azurelink.   |  Site Comments?